You are reading

CB 7 to Vote Monday on Controversial Flushing Waterfront Project

A rendering imagines the proposed Special Flushing Waterfront District, which Community Board 7 is set to vote on at its Monday meeting. (Image Courtesy Hill West Architects)

Feb. 6, 2020 By Ryan Brady

Community Board 7 will vote Monday, Feb. 10, on a major Flushing Creek waterfront special district and rezoning proposal that has generated opposition from area residents.

The land-use application from a landowner consortium called FWRA LLC seeks to turn 29 acres of mostly inactive property into the Special Flushing Waterfront District. There, a 13-tower, three million square foot mixed-use development would rise.

The space is bound by the creek to the west, 36th Avenue to the north, College Point Boulevard to the east and Roosevelt Avenue to the south. Under the plan, brownfield remediation would take place before construction starts.

Nearly 70 percent of the building area would be occupied by 1,725 residential units and 879 hotel rooms, with the rest of it being office and retail space. The development would also feature a publicly accessible waterfront park, around 1,600 parking spaces and a privately-owned road network open to outside traffic.

Much of the plan is as-of-right. But the application does request a rezoning for a small, northern chunk of the site where 300 of the residential units would be built. The space in question would go from an M3-1 manufacturing zone to one for M1-2/R7-1, a designation that allows residential usage. Because housing could be built as-of-right on the rest of the land, the city’s Mandatory Inclusionary Housing policy only requires the construction of 75 to 90 affordable units for the entire project.

In a statement, FWRA said the proposal “creates an integrated development strategy that knits together this area with Downtown Flushing and the Flushing Creek waterfront to become a beacon for Flushing and Queens.”

The developers have said that if the application isn’t approved, they will build a project that lacks the affordable units and road network of the existing proposal and features less public space by the creek.

CB 7’s decision is only advisory. After the board’s vote, the proposal moves to the borough president, the City Planning Commission and the City Council. When it comes to rezonings, Council custom dictates that it make a decision based on the stance of its member representing the area in question — in this case, Peter Koo.

The Flushing lawmaker is still evaluating the plan.

“The proposed Special Waterfront District could significantly transform the isolated waterfront of downtown Flushing,” Koo spokesman Scott Sieber said in a statement. “That said, we have many outstanding questions, so we’re watching very closely, but whatever is ultimately built here needs to enhance the downtown Flushing community as much as possible.”

A largely inactive part of Flushing’s waterfront would be radically transformed by the Special Flushing Waterfront District proposal that Community Board 7 will vote on at its Monday meeting. (Image Courtesy Hill West Architects)

Last month, CB 7’s Land Use Committee approved the project in a 15-1 vote. Joe Sweeney, the committee chairman, is especially pleased with FWRA’s road network plan.

“That is a big win because that will help with the traffic on College Point Boulevard,” he said.

However, the committee did create a list of recommendations to city officials and FWRA aimed at resolving issues that the development could create. Among other measures, it calls for a new public school in the area, where classroom overcrowding is highly common. Sweeney’s committee also wants Flushing’s No. 7 train station expanded west to Prince Street, closer to the proposed district.

Residents against the project charge it would worsen displacement and gentrification in Flushing. The critics have protested the proposal at recent CB 7 meetings.

Two of the main groups resisting the rezoning, the MinKwon Center for Community Action and Chhaya CDC, are urging stakeholders to voice their concerns at the Feb. 10 meeting.

Assemblymember Ron Kim is on the opponents’ side. He says the project would make it harder for non-wealthy families to live in Flushing. Though the lawmaker has no formal power to stop the plan, he’s urging those who do to pay attention to critics’ concerns.

“Folks can’t keep up with the pace of all the market-driven rent increases that are pricing out a lot of low-income and middle-class families,” he said.

CB 7 First Vice Chairman Chuck Apelian has recused himself from voting on the application because he is a hired consultant for FWRA. He could not be reached for comment prior to deadline.

The board’s Monday meeting will happen at 7 p.m. on the ninth floor of 33-23 Union St.

email the author: [email protected]

One Comment

Click for Comments 
Jay

Lol, not gonna happen. Flushing creek has been polluted for so many years. No amount of cleaning will help it. Especially with the constant pollution from College Point Industry Park a few blocks away

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Popular places where you can watch the Super Bowl in Queens

Feb. 2, 2023 By Tammy Scileppi

Hey, football fans! Game time is fast approaching, and across the city and here in Queens, you can feel the excitement brewing as the two teams prepare to take the field on Super Bowl Sunday, Feb. 12. So, kick back and watch the big game, and don’t miss Rihanna’s exciting performance during halftime. 

NYPD’s Hate Crime Task Force investigating vandalism at Forest Hills church that has been targeted in the past

The NYPD’s Hate Crimes Task Force is investigating a case of criminal mischief at a Forest Hills house of worship in which a vandal threw a rock to intentionally damage its glass front door, according to authorities.

Police say that just before 4 p.m. on Sunday, Jan. 29, police from the 112th Precinct were called to Grace Lutheran Church, located at 103-15 Union Tpke., after a man threw a rock and damaged the church’s front door.

Borough president hears from community members on budget needs throughout Queens

During a two-day public hearing on the mayor’s 2024 preliminary budget, Queens Borough President Donovan Richards Jr. listened to testimonies from 14 community board representatives, community stakeholders and members of the public on where the money should be spent in Queens. 

The public hearings were held both in-person and via Zoom on Monday, Jan. 30, and Tuesday, Jan. 31, at Queens Borough Hall. The testimonials will be used to develop the Queens Borough Board’s FY24 preliminary budget priorities in the coming weeks. 

‘He didn’t deserve to die’: Borough President Richards leads emotional candlelight vigil for Tyre Nichols

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards held a candlelight vigil for Tyre Nichols outside Queens Borough Hall Monday, Jan. 30 after Nichols’ death at the hands of police officers in Memphis, Tenn., made national headlines for the brutality in which the officers beat him.

Almost immediately after news broke about Nichols’ death, the Memphis police officers who beat him to death were fired and charged with murder. The police department released the body cam footage of the fatal beating on Jan. 27, but many people, including some at the vigil, have refused to watch it due to its extremely graphic nature.

BP launches new advisory panel for youth to become civically engaged in the future of Queens

In an effort to get more young people involved in civics, Queens Borough President Donovan Richards has created a new advisory panel known as the Youth and Young Adult Council to introduce the “youngest and fiercest” community advocates to both community service and organization.

Members of the advisory body will advocate concerns through means of community engagement by participating in one of two cohorts. The first will be made up of high school representatives between the ages of 13 and 17, while the second cohort will be comprised of young adults between the ages of 18 and 25.